The contributions to science by Charles Darwin Essay Example

The contributions to science by Charles Darwin Essay 214087 Title: The part to science by a scientist of your pick. 3000 words How does this part map to the scientific discipline course of study? How does the work of the scientist demonstrate the scientific method, or is it a antagonistic illustration? We will write a custom essay sample on The contributions to science by Charles Darwin specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The contributions to science by Charles Darwin specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The contributions to science by Charles Darwin specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer How can the work being discussed be used to turn to citizenship issues in schools? This paper discusses the part to science made by the English scientist Charles Darwin, ( 1809-1882 ) , writer ofThe Origin of Species( 1859 ) , the conceiver of the Theory of Natural Selection or Evolution. It examines the mode in which the work of Darwin could be related into the bing scientific discipline course of study, sing his work as an example of the scientific method. It besides sets out to associate the scientific finds and rules involved to other facets of the school course of study, particularly in the country of citizenship. The combative nature of Darwin’s discovery’ in his ain clip illustrates the fact that there is a common involvement in the subject: we are, in a sense, stakeholders in scientific facts and methods, since they help to find the form of our day-to-day lives. As the House of Lords points out, .this is non confined to scientists ; it extends to those who make policy, whether public or commercial, on the footing of scientific chances and ad vice. Policy-makers will happen it difficult to win public support .on any issue with a scientific discipline constituent, unless the populace s attitudes and values are recognised, respected and weighed in the balance along with the scientific and other factors.’ ( House of Lords, 2000, para 2.66 ) . Despite its age, Darwin’s theory continues to be debated, and can inform us about the importance of experimental accomplishments and scientific unity. It besides provides case in points for the manner scientific discipline and society interact, which may be utile in our society. As the Royal Society observes, It is therefore non swear in scientific disciplineper Sewhich is of concern but the velocity of scientific and technological development, the utilizations to which scientific discipline is put, and the ability of regulative and institutional constructions to maintain gait with this change.’ ( Royal Society, 2004, p.13 ) . Darwin’s work brought him ill f ame, but besides contention and personal sulfuric acid. ( See illustrations ) . This is where the nexus between scientific discipline and citizenship can be made. How does this part map to the scientific discipline course of study? As a 2002 Report by House of Lords acknowledges, The foundations of an involvement in scientific discipline are laid at primary school, between the ages of 5 and 11.’ ( House of Lords, parity. 6.3 ) The rule benefit which could be obtained through the work of Darwin is a general handiness, which would itself enable scholars to prosecute with the course of study. As Meadows points out, Much of knowledge and larning depends on placing the relevant cognition that the scholar already has in bing memory so that this cognition can be used as a starting point for larning what is new. Having no get downing point†¦will shackle acquisition and reasoning†¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ ( Meadows, 2006: p.112 ) . A assortment of governments and analysts have noted there that are go oning conceptual jobs in the manner scholars, and the wider community engage with scientific discipline. These are attributable to a assortment of factors. Qualitative ( i.e. phenomenological ) research commissioned jointl y by the DTI and the Wellcome Trust revealed public support for the thought that Science makes our lives change excessively fast.’ ( Wellcome Trust, 2000, p.23 ) Beyond this seemingly simple image there lay a more complex image, with differentiated degrees of apprehension and involvement claimed for different countries of scientific discipline. Environmental concerns, wellness issues and median finds held the greatest involvement for 82-91 per cent of respondents, whilst new engineering was considered more interesting by 74 per cent. Merely 48 per cent of those questioned claimed that energy issues were the most important for them. ( Wellcome Trust 2000: p.21 ) The same research besides discovered that it was possible to categorize respondents into different groups, determined by their involvement in scientific discipline, and the grade of trust they felt in scientific discipline and scientists. Correspondingly, topics characterised themselves as confident believers’ a t the terminal of the continuum most engaged with scientific discipline, to supporters’ half manner along the graduated table, right down to those who stated that scientific discipline was not for them’ . ( Wellcome 2000: pp.5-7 ) Correspondingly, there are several overlapping benefits which could be obtained through an expanded usage of Darwin’s work. First, an enhanced apprehension of scientific method, secondly, an improved consciousness of the operation of natural Torahs, and thirdly, the agencies by which research consequences are validated, interpreted and shared. The benefits of this could get down to be felt even at the Primary stage, as Peacock et.al. argue, Primary scientific discipline is possibly best regarded†¦as an rational, practical, originative and societal enterprise which seeks to assist kids to better understand and do sense of the universe in which they live†¦ ( and ) †¦should affect kids in thought and working in peculiar ways in the chase of dependable knowledge.’ ( Peacock et al. , 2007: p.1 ) . It is in this manner that a strict reading of the general rules established by Darwin might be really good, in turn overing and disputing pre-conceived thoughts abou t individuality and value, such as those frequently attributed to the alleged hidden curriculum.’ As Bishop and Simpson point out, The force per unit areas of the concealed course of study are besides present with respect to construction. The kids themselves can be really forceful in structuring scientific discipline activities with preconceived societal frameworks.’ ( Bishop and Simpson, 1995: p.7 ) . In thematic footings, Darwin’s work is exhaustively supportive of theKnowledge, Skills and Understandingcomponent of the scientific discipline course of study, i.e., Ideas and grounds in Science, Investigative Skills,and subordinate subjects such as planning and showing grounds. By the clip pupils reach Key Stage 3, these accomplishments are being further developed under the headers ofPractical and Enquiry Skills, Critical Understanding of Evidence,andCommunication.In practical footings, rules developed from Darwin’s theory could be incorporated into the scientific discipline course of study every bit early as unit 1A,Ourselves,and so continued on through cardinal Stage 2 inLife Processes and Living Things.Within the latter, it would be of import to concentrate on sub-unit 4,Variation and Classification,and 5,Populating Thingss in Their Environment, observing how living beings vary and alteration harmonizing to their context. This subject could be carried on development ally in the context of Key Stage Three, which incorporates two extremely relevant faculties,Organisms, Behaviour and Health,andThe Environment, Earth and Universe.Traveling off from the formal course of study, Darwin’s theory could assist by developing the foundations of causal logical thinking and besides job resolution, lending to a general betterment in scientific discipline criterions overall, across all units of survey. How does the work of the scientist demonstrate the scientific method, or is it a antagonistic illustration? From an educational and scientific position, Darwin’s work is interesting because it is based extensively on observation and tax write-off, instead than extended or quotable physical experimentation. Because of the tremendous timescales involved in the evolutionary procedures which preoccupied Darwin, it is in consequence, impossible to turn out, in absolute footings, whether the theory is right or non. The theory still has its disparagers, and direct oppositions, who object to it on ideological or theological evidences. Despite this nevertheless, it has become a by and large accepted scientific rule. Darwin’s work is hence, in one sense, the purest look of the scientific method, particularly since it was formulated in a vacuity of worthwhile ancestors, and an ambiance of considerable ideological resistance. The lone possible manner in which his work might be deemed a counter example’ is the mode in which it ran straight contrary to much mainstream scientific tho ught amongst his coevalss. However, it decidedly was a find madebecause of– instead thanin malice of– scientific method. Basically, what Darwin did was to suggest an reading of events, extrapolated from a huge sum of biological and geological grounds: he so formulated a specific reading of causality which, in his analysis, had merely one possible scientific result. It is this sort of experimental theoretical account, based on causality, which can tap into the learner’s innate cognitive ability, even from the youngest age. As Meadows observes of children’s interpretive perceptual experience, †¦By the beginning of school old ages, it follows basic causal rules, for illustration that causes precede effects instead than following effects, that they covary with their effects – the consequence on a regular basis and predictably appears after the cause and does non look without it, and the cause and consequence are close, or at least linked, in clip and space.’ . ( Meadows, 2006: p.109 ) How can the work being discussed be used to turn to citizenship issues in schools? As Rose and Rose indicate, it has ever been possible to take the position that, scientific discipline appears to progress in a more or less ordered mode, irrespective of the predominating societal environment in which it is performed.’ ( Rose and Rose, 1970, p.241 ) The power of Darwin’s work lays in its ability to bridge the spread between scientific discipline and the community, and it is here that his relevancy to issues of citizenship may be found. Darwin’s part to science every bit mirrored to a great extent by the manner his work reinforced other countries of academic, philosophical and societal survey: all of this makes it straight relevant to citizenship issues. As Wallace points out, A reading of theOrigin†¦do it hard to asseverate that Darwin’s head was devoid’ of economic and doctrine. A more sustainable decision is that it was permeated by rules of political economic system and doctrine in the signifier of a linguistic communicati on which did non distinguish between the political and the biological.’ ( Wallace 1995: p.11 ) In other words, Darwin’s work was implicitly bound up with the values of his host society: it is this which makes it an ideal nexus between scientific discipline and citizenship. The lone contrast is that we move from a Victorian context, to a present twenty-four hours one. This, it may be argued, has possible benefits for scientific discipline, instruction, and society likewise. As the Royal Society concluded with respect to the current scientific discipline course of study, many pupils lacked enthusiasm for . the topic, and felt frustrated by a content-heavy course of study which gave them small room to research controversial and ethical issues that might involvement them.’ ( Royal Society, 2004, p.21 ) Darwin’s work, it may be argued, is absolutely adapted to ease the latter: it is non distant, or obscure, and on certain degrees it is extremely accessible. The links between scientific discipline and citizenship manifest themselves in assorted ways. First, there is the whole issue of public apprehension of, and trust in scientific discipline. As Meadows points out, †¦understanding cause builds up into what has been called a naive physics’ , a coherent set of impressions about how objects behave ; if this gives rise to the formation and testing of hypotheses by observation and experiment, it becomes the footing for a natural philosophy which is scientific instead than naive.’ ( Meadows, 2006: p.109 ) . Darwin’s work Teachs us that it is non merely the observation of a phenomena, but the cultural capacity to absorb its significance, which is of import. Scientific affairs are non the distinct concern of the scientific community itself, but spill over into the political domain and finally concern us all. This is particularly true when ethical issues become involved, as they progressively tend to make in the biologi cal and life-sciences, impacting everything from the air we breathe, the nutrient we eat, the wellness intervention we can anticipate, and even the grade of control we might hold in finding the wellness, gender, and character of our kids. The of import point here is that attitudes vary, from a profound misgiving, to an about myopic religion in scientific discipline. As the House of Lords observed, neither place is wholly valid, a state of affairs it attributes sqaurely to schools. In common idiom, scientific is about synonymous with certain . This perceptual experience, which is likely picked up at school, is virtually true of much old and well-established scientific cognition. In many of the countries of current concern, from clime alteration to malignant neoplastic disease, it is nevertheless really broad of the mark.’ ( House of Lords, 2000, parity. 4.1 ) It is non the fallibility of scientific discipline which is utile from a citizenship point of position, but instead the necessity of keeping an unfastened head and capacity for nonsubjective argument. It is besides of import to retrieve that we all portion a corporate duty for the manner that society is conducted, and the mode in which scientific matter are run on our behalf. Again, this is non a distant or academic argument, and at its most intense, can show the relevancy of scientific method in our mundane lives. As the Royal Society points out, modern-day crises such as that created by BSE illustrates this. BSE highlighted profound concerns about the scientific discipline advice procedure and the function of scientists and authorities functionaries, the effectivity policy devising and action within sections such as the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, the ability of Curates to both gage and communicate hazard efficaciously, and basically the relationship between scientific discipline and politics.’ ( Royal Society, 2004, p.17 ) If we take the Key Stage Three Citizenship course of study as an illustration, the continued relevancy of Darwin’s thoughts becomes evident. In the domain of political, legal and human rights, we must take history of the DFES counsel that every kid is A alone kid .every kid is a competent scholar from birth who can be resilient, capable, confident and self assured. ( DFES, 2007: p.5 ) . The kernel of Darwin’s idea is that all people are descended from the same ultimate beginning, and hence equality before the jurisprudence, and of political rights, is a requirement of an just society and civil civil order. This in bend leads into the rules of democracy and the thought everyone should hold a voice in finding the legislative behavior of authorities. The importance of keeping freedom of address and leting a diverseness of positions are besides indispensable to the rules of citizenship as enshrined in the course of study. It is of import to retrieve that, without these installations, Darwin’s scientific thoughts might neer hold received public attending. In Section 2,Key Processes,the KS3 Citizenship course of study requires that scholars †¦engage with and reflect on different thoughts, sentiments, beliefs and values when researching topical and controversial issues and problems.’ ( QCA 2007: p.30 ) . Darwin knew that printing his thoughts about development in Victorian society would pull ferocious resistance from many quarters, because of its disagreement with scriptural instructions about the Creation. This resistance was likely to be immoveable and immune to logic: As Hull points out, those †¦who rejected evolutionary theory chiefly for theological reasons†¦would non hold been able to accept it even if all the grounds had been overpoweringly in its favor – which it was not.’ ( Hull 1974: p.450 ) . Similarly, his right to debate his theories with opposition s and critics formed an of import portion of the manner in which he basically changed attitudes, manner beyond the strictly scientific sphere. As Darwin himself wrote of one of his counter-theorists, He will be dead against me, as you prophesied†¦but he is liberally civil to me personally. On his criterion of cogent evidence,naturalscientific discipline would neer come on, for without the devising of theories I am convinced there would be no observation.’ ( Hull 1974: p.229 ) . As can be seen from this, it should be possible, in a tolerant and progressive society, to show and discourse opposed positions in a sensible manner: the freedom to make this, and finding to protect such freedoms, are of import dogmas of modern-day citizenship. As the Key Stage Three citizenship course of study puts it, responsible citizens should be able to †¦communicate an statement, taking history of different point of views and pulling on what they have learnt through research, action and debate†¦justify their statement, giving grounds to seek to carry others to believe once more, alteration or support them.’ ( QCA 2007: p.30 ) . In modern-day UK society, responsible citizenship besides requires us to understand diverseness of civilizations and individualities, and that motion of people, either temporarily or for good, is an intrinsic characteristic of our society and economic system. This is to the full reflected in the citizenship course of study, which states that scholars should recognize †¦the hanging nature of UK society, including the diverseness of thoughts, beliefs, civilizations, individualities, traditions, positions and values that are shared.’ ( QCA 2007: p.33 ) Darwin’s theory of natural choice is supportive of such positions in a assortment of ways. By learning us that we all have common beginnings, his believing undermines any thoughts of intrinsic racial difference, or any barriers erected around such thoughts. Since we all developed from the same biological beginning, there can be no justification for valuing any single otherwise: in other words, constructs of biological d eterminism’ are invalidated. Furthermore, any effort to make so can, by Darwin’s instruction, at one time be revealed as arbitrary, subjective and unscientific. There are obvious cross-curricular links to be made here, both historically and in footings of modern-day societies, where such conditions still endure. Children are natural perceivers of the phenomenon around them, and Darwin’s thoughts are deeply supportive of this. Meadows points out that kids †¦appear to pull illations about the causes of events they see, to know apart between self-caused and other-caused motion, to categorise living things that are agents as different from inanimate objects.’ ( Meadows, 2006: p.109 ) . Bing citizens besides accrues us the duty to alter things for the better: correspondingly, although we have rights in society, we have a responsibility to guarantee that such rights are exercised responsibly, without encroaching on the rights of others. Darwin’s the ory besides taught us that we are, as societal histrions, wholly mutualist upon each other. Bibliography Amigon, D. , and Wallace, J. , ( 1995 ) ,Charles Darwin’s the Origin of Species: new Interdisciplinary essays.: Manchester University Press, Manchester. Anderson, R.D. , ( 1992 ) ,Universities and Elites in Britain since 1800,MacMillan, Basingstoke. Bishop, A. , and Simpson, R. , ( 1995 ) , Strategies for Structured Play in Science in the Nursery’ ,Primary Teaching Studies,Autumn, Vol.9, No.3, pp.5-8. Burgess, R.G. , ( 1989 ) ,The Ethical motives of Educational Research,Falmer Press, Lewes. The Children’s Plan: Building Brighter Futures, ( 2007 ) , Department for Children, Schools and Families. HMSO, London. DeFalco, J. , Trade-Offs, Risks and Regulations in Science and Technology: Deductions for STS Education.’ , in Kamur, D.D. , and Chubin, D.E. , ( explosive detection systems ) , ( 2000 ) ,Science, Technologyand Society: A Sourcebook on Research and Practice,Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. DFES, ( 2007 ) ,Practice Guidance for the Early Years Foundation Phase: Puting the Standards for Learning, Development and Care for Children from Birth to Five,HMSO, London. House of Lords,( 2000 )ScienceandTechnology, 3rdReport, downloaded from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm Hull, D.L. , ( 1974 ) ,Darwin and his Critics,Harvard University Press, Mass. Kamur, D.D. , and Chubin, D.E. , ( explosive detection systems ) , ( 2000 ) ,Science, Technologyand Society: A Sourcebook on Research and Practice,Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. Lenton and McNeil, ( 1991 ) , Primary school instructors understanding of the biological constructs in the National Curriculum’ Primary Teaching Studies, Oct. , Vol.6, No.2, pp.196-203. Mackenzie, D. , and Wacjman, J. , ( explosive detection systems ) , ( 1994 ) ,The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator got its Hum,Open University Press, Milton Keynes. Mauther, M. , Birch, M. , Jessop, J. , and Miller, T. , ( 2002 ) ,Ethical motives in Qualitative Research,London, Sage. Meadows, S. , ( 2006 ) ,The Child as Thinker: The Development and Acquisition of Cognition in Childhood,Routledge, London. Pursell, C. , ( 1994 ) ,White Heat,BBC Books, London. QCA, ( 2007 ) ,Citizenship: Program of Study for Key Stage 3 and Attainment Target,QCA. Rose, H. , and Rose, S. , ( 1970 ) ,Science and Society,Penguin, Harmandsworth. The Royal Society, ( 2004 )Excellence in Science: Science in Society,London. Rose, H. , and Rose, S. , ( 1970 ) ,Science and Society,Penguin, Harmandsworth. Scruton, R. , ( 1982 ) ,A Dictionary of Political Thought,MacMillan, London. Science and the Public: A Review of Science Communication and Public Attitudes to Science in Britain, A Joint Report by the Office of Science and Technology and the Wellcome Trust, ( 2000 ) , HMSO, London. Wakeford, T. , and Walters, M. , ( explosive detection systems ) ( 1995 )Science for the Earth: Can Science Make the World a Better Place?John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. Wallace, J. , ( 1995 ) Introduction: trouble and defamiliarisation-language and procedure in theBeginning of Species’, in Amigon, D. , and Wallace, J. , ( 1995 ) ,Charles Darwin’s the Origin of Species: new Interdisciplinary essays.: Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp.1-46. Winner, L. , Do Artefacts Have Politics’ , in Mackenzie, D. , and Wacjman, J. , ( explosive detection systems ) , ( 1994 ) ,The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator got its Hum,Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

The New Jersey and Virginia Plans essays

The New Jersey and Virginia Plans essays The New Jersey and the Virginia Plans benefited both the smaller and larger states as two separate individual plans, with two different missions. The Great Compromise was a major progression towards the unification of all states under a new national government. The fear of creating an administration that was too powerful was the basis for foundation of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles proved to provide a weak government that allowed for most of the power to be under the control of the state legislatures. Under the Articles Congress had no means to prevent war or to provide for national security against foreign invasion. The federal government could not resolve the quarrels between states, regulate interstate trade, collect taxes, or enforce laws. These weaknesses of the confederation distressed political leaders. In response they requested an assemblage in order to revise the Articles and revive the fledgling nation. In May of 1787, representatives from each state gathered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to find the means of turning the United States government into an efficient and powerful business that conducted affairs in practical ways. The delegates meeting at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 were given expressed consent to alter and revise the Articles of Confederation. With the exception of those from New Jersey and Virginia, the delegates intended to revise the Articles. The first issue that they resolved was that of State Representation. William Paterson and his colleagues offered a list of suggestions for revising the Articles of Confederation in his New Jersey Plan. Paterson, a delegate from New Jersey, favored the weak national government that the Articles created. Paterson declared inequality of the rights of the small states against the large states and wished to expand upon the Articles making a more representative and well-organized government. The Ne...

Classic Comparative Advantage vs. Porter's Competative Advantage Essay

Classic Comparative Advantage vs. Porter's Competative Advantage - Essay Example These five forces explain the rules of competition in any industry. As per Porter, the ultimate aim of any competitive strategy is to cope and change the rules in the behavior of any firm. (Porter’s 5 Forces and Industry Structure, n.d.) The firms create competitive advantage by discovering better and innovative ways and bring them to the market that act as an innovation. These innovations shift the competitive advantage when the rivals fail to perceive new ways of competing or are unable to respond. It is quite obvious that there are noticeable advantages for the early movers. The typical causes that shift the competitive advantage are shifting buyer needs, new technologies, changes in government regulations, shifting the availability or input costs, and the emergence of any new industry segment. A particular firm gains the competitive advantage by performing the strategically important activities in a more cheap way than its competitors. In other words, it is able to deliver similar benefits like its competitors, but at a much lower cost. A firm might also deliver benefits that exceed the benefits of its competitive products. Therefore, competitive advantage enables a firm in order to create greater value for the customers and in turn, higher benefits for itself. Thus, Michael Porter has identified two types of competitive advantages; differentiation advantage and cost advantage. (Competitive Advantage, n.d.) David Ricardo has explained the famous theory of Comparative Advantage in explaining foreign trade. Explaining with the example of two nations and two commodities, he argued that trade is beneficial even if one country has absolute cost advantage over the other country in both the commodities. Ricardo has argued that there are gains from the trade, even if a particular nation specializes completely in the production of a particular good, which has a

The Development of International Managers Assignment

The Development of International Managers - Assignment Example In the present-day organization, because any discussion about how an organization succeeds or fails ultimately comes back to the way individuals are managed, Academics and Practitioners agree that as the dynamics of competition accelerates, people are perhaps the only true source of competitive advantage4. According to, Turner, Keegan & Human (2006:317), for an organization to be effective and successful, the human resource management functions must be integrated into the various organizational strategy. According to this model, the HRM functions its goals and aims, need to be aligned with the strategy of the organization. Here the emphasis is both on the on projects and routine products and services and where the job requirements are well defined and stable. This paper has been initiated to support to examine an ideal training package for an international manager. Using the work of prominent researchers in the field issues taken into consideration when developing training packages for an international manager will be presented. The field of human resource (HR) management is one of the many interesting areas of research that has witnessed a paradigm shift within the last few decades5. Within this area of research, an increasing body of literature contains the argument that high-performance work practices, including comprehensive employee's recruitment, selection procedures, incentives compensation, and performance management systems, and extensive employee's involvement and training can improve the knowledge, skills, and abilities of firms6. Today, with the increasing researchers desires to demonstrate the importance of an effective human resource policy on organization performance research has shifted from a micro level that previously dominated research interest to a more general, strategic macro level7. The term human resource management is not new. It has been widely used by scholars and managers to refer to the set of policies designed to maximize organizational integration, employee commitment, flexibility and quality of work8.

Dont Actually Use This Crap Essay Example for Free

Dont Actually Use This Crap Essay I have decided to research and discuss how we can use heritage to build a nation in order to promote our understanding of a common humanity. In order to discuss and debate the abovementioned question we need to understand some key phrases in the question. In my opinion, that would include the following key concepts, namely; * heritage, * nation and * a common humanity. South Africa has come from a turbulent past where terms such as heritage, nation building and a common humanity meant different things to various population groups and realistically these concepts were worlds apart for the majority of South Africans. In order to achieve a common humanity, we need to respect all the cultures and religions within our country. People learn and are influenced by the place and the people around them. In a country like South Africa many people have learned from stories told to them. These stories carry information and ideas about life and living and shared customs, traditions and memories from parents to children. A persons heritage is made up of the practices, and traditions that are passed on from parents to children. Heritage is also about what has been passed on from the family, community and place where people have been raised. For example a person may have grown up in a family of medical professionals or in a proudly Zulu family where the old customs are still followed. This is part of their heritage. People also have a national heritage. A person who was born in South Africa has a South African heritage. This also means they have an African heritage because they were born on this continent. There are many South Africans who do not know what our Coat of Arms represents or the meaning of our flag and anthem. In order to be a truly successful nation we need to become more aware of these national symbols. If we achieve this it will contribute to a more powerful form of nation-building. In countries with a huge variety of cultural, ethnic, racial, religious and other social identities, nation-building is a big challenge. This challenge has led governments to take numerous steps to create a peaceful and workable country. In Africa the situation is made more difficult by the fact that there are many identities and cultures. Mandaza describes such states as nation-states-in-the-making, which are characterised by a lack of essence, weakness and dependency. I think that the role of the curriculum in schools plays an essential role in promoting an understanding of a common humanity in all young people. Researchers often make reference to the neglected role of the history curriculum in the debate on nation-building and the process of forging general citizenship in Africa. In this context, the concept curriculum is understood from many people to be the point of view of the political party in power. The curriculum emerges directly from society and is an ideological tool as well as a vehicle of social change driven by the dominant social group. As such, it plays a central role in the development and reproduction of society over time and geographical area. Seen from this perspective, it is no wonder that the curriculum is driven by political regimes in an endeavour to promote common values and form a particular type of citizen. We most certainly can, but it takes a lot of hard work. Each of our many cultures must get a little space in the sun. What we must also realise though is that some cultures are very different from others and that some people might find the things we may want to defend offensive. The question we should ask is whether our practices are more likely to cause division and friction, or whether it is going to bring people of different cultures together. What we should perhaps work on is getting our country to a point where there is loyalty to the flag no matter what. We must be able to really be proud of our achievements as a nation, and not vote people into office that will embarrass us. If we can all stand behind the flag, I think it will be one thing that can unite us. Look what the Rugby World Cups and the recent 2010 Soccer World Cup did for our nation. The whole nation standing for a common cause and goal. There was a real sense of nation-building. Culture is not something you are born with. It is learned from family, school, religious teachings, television and media and the government of a country. Advertisements, magazines and movies are also powerful guides. For example American music videos promote a certain style of dress, values, expression and attitude for young people. Many young people like the cool speak of American pop music rather than talking in their home language. Schools and religious organisations also play a big role. Religion has many rituals that symbolise belonging to a particular culture. South Africa has been called the rainbow nation because it has so many cultural practices. Cultural practices are how we talk and behave, the ways in which we pray, the special things we do when we have festivals, births and deaths. We have groups with different languages, religions, race, customs and traditions e. . Zulu, Ndebele, Khoisan, Hindu, Muslim and Afrikaner people. All of these people are united by being South African and all of their ways of life form part of our country’s identity and culture. It is important to promote and be proud of our South African culture and identity. This helps South Africans to understand and respect each other and to learn from each other’s cultural practices. This is part of the healing that demo cracy has brought after culture was used to divide South Africans in the past. For this reason the government has a project called â€Å"Proudly South African† that encourages South Africans to value each other and the country. The past is all around us. We live our lives against a rich backdrop of historic buildings, landscapes and other physical survivals of our past. But the historic environment is more than just a matter of material remains. It is central to how we see ourselves and to our identity as individuals, communities and as a nation. It is a physical record of what our country is and how it came to be. Building materials and styles can define region’s localities and communities. Historic landscapes or iconic buildings can become a focus of community identity and pride. At a more local level a historic church or park can help define a neighbourhood and create a sense of identity and belonging. The importance that we attach to our ‘heritage’ is growing each year, and that is why events such as Heritage Day are important in enabling people to value and appreciate their local, regional and national heritage. I encourage people of all ages to take this opportunity to visit, tour and experience the buildings and streets on your doorstep and learn a little about the rich heritage of the region in which you live. Port Elizabeth and the Eastern Cape is full of heritage. Nation building enables history to be rewritten, and the apartheid legacy of devaluing and erasing the heritage of black South Africans from the consciousness of the nation to be reversed, facilitating healing and further weakening the feelings of â€Å"better† citizenship of one population group over the other. Attempts to reverse this and give back pride to the African, Indian and Coloured South Africans receive support from many people. This includes government efforts to teach children about African heroes and Africa’s contributions to world history and culture. Nation building is necessary to build trust, which is directly linked with stronger economic performance. If all South Africans were passionate and believed in each other and were not divided on many issues as we are, our country would perform better financially and this would improve international investments and job opportunities. We (South Africans) need to develop the same patriotism and passion that the Americans show to their flag and anthem. We can continue to rebuild our nation with our heritage by raising awareness. There are a lot of South Africans who do not know anything about the Heritage of our country, therefore, by having exhibitions, distributing leaflets, organising work groups (community and schools), quarterly newsletters distributed within the community, media exposure or maybe even raising awareness by means of radio shows , talks and shows, we can continue to build our nation. Only when all Africans own and cherish their cultural heritage, when they identify and embrace the majesty of Mapungubwe, when they speak and learn through their languages and can therefore dream, sing and dance in their own languages, shall we see rapid social economic development of the people of Africa. A nation needs a history. History buys you time to get rid of emotional responses and see things rationally. The English civil war, for example, has taught people of Royalist descent that a ruler who leeches the country for his/her personal benefits shouldnt be tolerated. On the other hand, descendants of Parliamentarians can see that its not enough just to chop off a bad kings head. You need something good to replace him with. England had eleven years of misery after beheading Charles 1, and couldnt wait to get another king. Nobody could understand that at the time because they were emotionally involved with one side or the other. It took time for both sides to overcome the hurts and prejudices, and to understand what happened, but eventually, they grew as a nation from the lessons learned. Heroes fall into two categories. They can either be people of great achievement (like Newton or Darwin) or they can reflect some aspect of national character (like Robin Hood or Scotlands William Wallace). Heroes are people that kids can look up to, people who inspire kids to achieve something, and that all helps to form a single national identity. A common identity the need to preserve it, promote it and keep it alive is a struggle of both individuals and many nations. Your identity is not only a current thing. It is originates from and is dependent upon the sum-total of your cultural heritage. All the things that your ancestors have done on the cultural front, i. e. their language, dances, rituals, dress, food and all that, contribute towards your present identity. As a young South African I feel that the youth of today need to learn and understand the events of the past so we can understand how to move forward in the best interests of all South Africans. I consider it essential for our future that we all stand behind a common identity namely our flag and anthem. Nation building is important and imperative to create a feeling of belonging and with it accountability and responsible behaviour. Efforts must be made to ensure that all cultures are respected and equal citizenship for all guaranteed. This is important because for centuries the dominant people in power aimed to diminish all culture and history of certain cultures and religions. This â€Å"past† obviously did not use heritage to build a nation in order to promote our understanding of a common humanity.

Analyzing User Requirements by the Unified Process and Total Quality Management :: essays research papers

Analyzing User Requirements by the Unified Process and Total Quality Management Summary A successful project demands a correct and thorough requirements analysis. This paper proposes a refined requirements workflow, TQM/UP, to analyze requirements systematically. This workflow integrates five management and statistical analysis tools of Total Quality Management (TQM)—Affinity diagram, Tree diagram, Brainstorming, Pareto analysis and Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC)—into the Unified Process (UP) and helps the team to analyze requirements in a more efficient way. The guidelines I provide are based on my own experiences in an IT company, Interlancer, Limited which is briefly introduced at the latter part of this paper. Educator & practitioner summary I would like to thank all of the people at UL for their support and input during this project. I give special thanks to my project advisor, Mr. John Noonan, for his support and guidance. I would also like to thank my girlfriend, for her enduring support over the past several weeks. Contents Summary 1 Educator & practitioner summary 2 1 Introduction 5 2 What are Requirements? 5 3 Capturing Requirements by UP 6 3.1 What is UP? 7 3.1.1 UP is Use-Case Driven 7 3.1.2 UP is Architecture-Centric 8 3.1.3 UP is Iterative and Incremental 8 3.2 The Life of UP 8 3.3 The Role of Requirements in the Software Life Cycle 10 3.4 Requirements Workflow in UP 10 4 A Refined Requirements Workflow: TQM/UP 13 4.1 Introduction of TQM Tools 13 4.1.1 Affinity diagram 13 4.1.2 Tree diagram 13 4.1.3 Brainstorming 13 4.1.4 Pareto analysis 14 4.1.5 Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC) 14 4.2 TQM/UP 14 4.2.1 How to Analyze the Problem? 14 4.2.2 How to Understand Stakeholder Needs? 17 4.2.3 How to Define the System? 18 4.2.4 How to Manage the Scope of the System? 19 4.2.5 How to Refine the System Definition? 20 5 A real world case: Interlancer, Limited 21 5.1 A brief introduction of Interlancer 21 5.2 TQM/UP in Interlancer 22 5.2.1 Analyze the Problem 22 5.2.2 Understand Stakeholder Needs 24 5.2.3 Define the System 27 5.2.4 Manage the Scope of the System 27 5.2.5 Refine the System Definition 28 6 Conclusion 30 Appendix: Glossary of Terms 31 List of illustrations 32 List of tables 32 References 33 1 Introduction Requirements analysis of a software system is one of the most crucial steps in the software development process. Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. has pointed out that no other part of the work so cripples the resulting system if done wrong and no other part is more difficult to rectify later than requirements analysis. The potential impact of errors in requirements is substantial: †¢ The resulting software may not satisfy users’ real needs.

Job skills Essay

VERBAL COMMUNICATION 1 Able to express your ideas clearly and confidently in speech TEAMWORK 2 Work confidently within a group COMMERCIAL AWARENESS 3 Understand the commercial realities affecting the organisation. ANALYSING & INVESTIGATING 4 Gather information systematically to establish facts & principles. Problem solving. INITIATIVE/SELF MOTIVATION 5 Able to act on initiative, identify opportunities & proactive in putting forward ideas & solutions DRIVE 6 Determination to get things done. Make things happen & constantly looking for better ways of doing things. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 7 Able to express yourself clearly in writing PLANNING & ORGANISING 8 Able to plan activities & carry them through effectively FLEXIBILITY 9 Adapt successfully to changing situations & environments TIME MANAGEMENT 10 Manage time effectively, prioritising tasks and able to work to deadlines. Other skills that were also seen as important GLOBAL SKILLS Able to speak and understand other languages. Appreciation of other cultures. See Study and work placements outside the UK Working Abroad NEGOTIATING & PERSUADING Able to influence and convince others, to discuss and reach agreement. LEADERSHIP Able to motivate and direct others NUMERACY Multiply & divide accurately, calculate percentages, use statistics & a calculator, interpret graphs & tables. COMPUTING SKILLS Word-processing, using databases, spreadsheets, the Internet & email, designing web pages etc. SELF AWARENESS Awareness of achievements, abilities, values & weaknesses & what you want out of life. PERSONAL IMPACT/CONFIDENCE Presents a strong, professional, positive image to others which inspires confidence & commands respect. LIFELONG LEARNING Continues to learn throughout life. Develops the competencies needed for current & future roles STRESS TOLERANCE Maintains effective performance under pressure INTEGRITY Adheres to standards & procedures, maintains confidentiality and questions inappropriate behaviour. INDEPENDENCE Accepts responsibility for views & actions and able to work under their own direction & initiative. DEVELOPING PROFESSIONALISM Pays care & attention to quality in all their work. Supports & empowers others. ACTION PLANNING Able to decide what steps are needed to achieve particular goals and then implement these. DECISION-MAKING Determines the best course of action. Evaluates options based on logic & fact & presents solutions INTERPERSONAL SENSITIVITY Recognises & respects different perspectives. Open to the ideas & views of others CREATIVITY Generates & applying new ideas & solutions